1. But really, inside the genealogy and family history, most of us knowthat for every single signal you will find a difference. A beneficial vexing part ofgenealogy is that nobody most knows just how to put on the fresh new exceptions orrules with one decisive adjective for example always, maybe, most likely,almost certainly, an such like. It will be interesting in the event the indeed there almost every other instances ofjointures getting generated a year otherwise a couple of shortly after a well-known wedding time.

2. Can there be an extant dispensation on wedding out of ElizabethClifford and Sir Ralph Bowes who were 3rd cousins thru Henry Fitzhugh,3rd Lord Fitzhugh otherwise next cousins, shortly after removed from the fifth LordClifford? Who would restrict the wedding time.

Arthur

Allegedly, when the a beneficial dispensation is needed and you may provided, it can havebeen because of the among the many pursuing the, and could can be found in brand new correspondingregister book, whether or not it survives:

Thomas Savage, Archbishop off York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop off Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop away from York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop out of Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop off Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop of Carlisle 1502-1508John Cent, Bishop out of Carlisle 1509-1520

5. If your tenth Lord Clifford do get married at the beginning of 1487 [state January] andhas Age later in that seasons, does brand new chronology perhaps not functions?

John palms?

Age born inside later 1487, Henry produced inside the 1488/9, Joan within the ,etcetera. filling out the new names of one’s send of . If (a) thechronology still works; and you can (b) their own wedding bit wasn’t lowest; thenwe simply have the new 1505 pedigree from Henry VII’s that is when you look at the oppositionto brand new supposition one to she was a valid daughter.

six. About your 1505 pedigree: Are definitely the Clifford daughters the onlyknown Henry VII affairs omitted? Are there anyone else? If so,would not one echo poorly with this file since the a resource?

Of comparisons You will find made of brand new c.1505 Henry VII Affairs pedigreeswith brand new 1480-1500 Visitation of your own Northern pedigrees, which happen to be

In the c.1505 Interactions pedigrees, the latest Clifford youngsters are not listedin a good Clifford pedigree, but alternatively throughout the St. John pedigree. Because I’mnot accustomed the newest St. John family, pursuing the is the suggestions asit looks about c.1505 pedigree, once the obtained from the brand new 1834 Coll. Best. etGen. article. This new phrasing when you look at the quotations is exactly whilst looks inthe 1834 post (pp. 310-311).

“Zero. XII.”Of my personal Lord Welles daughter, Sir Richard Pole, Mistress Verney, SirJohn St. John, together with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess off Somerset got about three husbands.” From the “John Duke ofSomerset” she had “My Lady the King’s Mom.” that has “The newest Queen.” whohad “Prince “Because of the “Sir Oliver Saint John, basic partner.” she got 3 daus & dos sons:

A beneficial. “Edith, wedded to help you Geoffrey Pole of Buckinghamshire.” They’d:A1. “Sir Richard Rod, Knt. wedded with the Lady Margaret, dau. out of theDuke away from Clarence.” They had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, married in order to Ralph Verney, Esq.” That they had: “John Verney.—– [child, unnamed]. ——-[an alternative child, unnamed].”

B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He’d five youngsters:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” that has “Four daughters and you may oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. to help you Harry Lord Clifford.” That they had “Jane. Mabill.Henry, young buck and heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “E, wedded to help you Thomas Kent, Esq. out-of Lincolnshire.”B4. “A beneficial Nun out-of Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”

C. “Dame Mary, married so you can Sir Richard Frognall.” That they had:C1. “Edmond Frognall and his brethren and you may sistren.” Which have issueindicated, however entitled.C2. “Age, wedded in order to Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”

D. “E, wedded basic to your Lord Zouche; immediately webbplatsen after with the LordScrope out of Bolton.” Issue:D1. [from the Zouche] ” Catesby.” They had:”E. George. John. William.”D2. [because of the Scrope] ” Conyers.” Having issueindicated although not titled.

Margaret Duchess regarding Somerset, of the “Lionel Lord Welles, history spouse.”had: “John Viscount Welles, married Cecily, dau. of K. Edward IV.” andthey had “E.”